Yes, believe it or not this is a porno trailer (without nudity).
I wonder what the film's budget was because digital effects look better than on most Stephen Baldwin epics made for the Sci-Fi Channel.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Where Babbling About Politics, Superheroes, and Sports Collides into One Big Gelatinous Mass.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(275)
-
▼
March
(40)
- For Sake of Argument
- Note To Self
- Fire in The Hole
- Vintage Paper
- Cheap Fiddles
- A Very Brief Review: "The Haunting in Connecticut"
- Dicked Again
- Nyuk
- Rust
- Lobster Bucket
- Mediocrity On The March
- Let's Go!
- Breathe Normally
- Urinetown
- Because Any Day is a Good Day for Churchin' Up
- Daybreak Redux
- Baffling
- Azure
- Sign Of The Times
- May Day
- Ring Me
- Spectral
- So Say We All
- Spring Training
- Heretic
- Westworld
- Alamo
- Debate
- Staggered
- Spring Ahead
- Coffee Achievers
- Low Brains & High Tea
- Buckethead
- A Very Brief Review: "Watchmen"
- Three Minutes to Midnight
- Bonding
- Invertebrates
- Great Quotes From Great Americans
- Burn Baby Burn
- Circular
-
▼
March
(40)
The Church of Shiny Objects
This Week's Sermon: "Survival"
About Me
Links I Love
- Americans United for Separation (C&S)
- Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
- Anti-Cruelty Society
- Atomic Books
- FiveThirtyEight
- Fortunate Cookie
- Ink & Thunder
- Maryland SPCA
- Media Matters for America
- Michigan Humane Society
- PDGA
- Planned Parenthood
- The Elephant Sanctuary
- The Invincible Super-Blog
- Washington Animal Rescue League
Listening, Watching...
1 comment:
Even funnier, it looks like it may even have a better plot and better dialog than a lot of those bad 'made for tv' movies the scifi channel makes too.
(Not that it takes much to beat some of the crap they produce - how can the same station that gives us Eureka and Battlestar make such bad 'horror' movies.)
Post a Comment